Working...

Your Cart

  • Your cart is empty

Back


CA AMMO BACKGROUND CHECK STRUCK DOWN

02/01/2024
Jan 31 (Reuters) - California cannot enforce a law requiring people to undergo background checks to buy ammunition, because it violates the constitutional right to bear arms, a federal judge has ruled. In a decision made public on Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez in San Diego said the background checks have "no historical pedigree," and violate the Second Amendment by treating all citizens as having no right to buy ammunition. 
"A sweeping background check requirement imposed every time a citizen needs to buy ammunition is an outlier that our ancestors would have never accepted for a citizen," wrote Benitez, an appointee of Republican President George W. Bush. Benitez also criticized California's handling of the more than 1 million annual ammunition background checks, calling the 11% rejection rate "too high." California appealed the decision to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, and Benitez rejected its request for a stay that would allow background checks during that process. "These laws were put in place as a safeguard and a way of protecting the people of California--and they work," state Attorney General Rob Bonta, a Democrat. "Background checks save lives." Governor Gavin Newsom, also a Democrat, renewed his criticism of Benitez for having issued multiple decisions favoring firearms owners, including a Sept. 2023 ruling that voided California's ban on high-capacity gun magazines. 
"Like clockwork, Judge Benitez has yet again put his personal politics and fealty for the gun lobby over the Constitution and common sense," Newsom said. "California will fight this extremist, illogical, and incoherent ruling as we defend our life-saving measures that are proven to keep our communities safe."
Plaintiffs in the case included Kim Rhode, opens new tab, who has won three Olympic gold medals in shooting events, and the California Rifle & Pistol Association.
 Chuck Michel, the group's president and general counsel, called the decision a "big win," saying California had "blocked many eligible people from getting the ammunition they need, which is the true political intent behind most of these laws."